alternate readings

My Photo
Name:
Location: United States

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Is Ἐν ἀρχῇ a temporal locator in Genesis 1:1?

In response to comments on a recent post concerning Rashi’s treatment of Genesis 1:1 Rashi’s treatment of Genesis 1:1 Joel M. Hoffman said “I think that b’reishit is a sentence level adverb here, and that it answers the question ‘when?’”. Mulling this over, I was wondering if clause initial adverbial expressions were commonplace at the beginning of an ancient narrative text. In other words, is the temporal locator in a narrative text typically the very first thing we encounter in the text. I looked at a small sample of ancient texts including narrative prose, gospels, tragic drama, and prophetic writings. I used the Greek version of the Old Testament just to speed up the process.

In the five books of Moses, Genesis 1:1 is the only place where we find an adverbial expression at the very beginning of the text. In Josua 1:1 we read

Josh. 1:1 καὶ ἐγένετο μετὰ τὴν τελευτὴν Μωυσῆ εἶπεν κύριος τῷ Ἰησοῖ υἱῷ Ναυη τῷ ὑπουργῷ Μωυσῆ λέγων

This is a relative temporal locator using the death of Moses as a point of reference. This is a common pattern in biblical narrative. The temporal locator is not often the very first thing we encounter (1Kings, 2Kings, Ezra, Nehemiah, Isaiah, Hosea, Amos, Zephaniah). In Jeremiah the temporal locator doesn't show up until the middle of the second verse and it is quite elaborate.

Jeremiah 1:1 τὸ ῥῆμα τοῦ θεοῦ ὃ ἐγένετο ἐπὶ Ιερεμιαν τὸν τοῦ Χελκιου ἐκ τῶν ἱερέων ὃς κατῴκει ἐν Αναθωθ ἐν γῇ Βενιαμιν 2 ὃς ἐγενήθη λόγος τοῦ θεοῦ πρὸς αὐτὸν ἐν ταῖς ἡμέραις Ιωσια υἱοῦ Αμως βασιλέως Ιουδα ἔτους τρισκαιδεκάτου ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ αὐτοῦ 3 καὶ ἐγένετο ἐν ταῖς ἡμέραις Ιωακιμ υἱοῦ Ιωσια βασιλέως Ιουδα ἕως ἑνδεκάτου ἔτους Σεδεκια υἱοῦ Ιωσια βασιλέως Ιουδα ἕως τῆς αἰχμαλωσίας Ιερουσαλημ ἐν τῷ πέμπτῳ μηνί

In Haggai and Daniel the relative temporal locator is not only clause initial it is a prepositional phrase similar to Gen. 1:1.

Haggai 1:1 ἐν τῷ δευτέρῳ ἔτει ἐπὶ Δαρείου τοῦ βασιλέως ἐν τῷ μηνὶ τῷ ἕκτῳ μιᾷ τοῦ μηνὸς ἐγένετο λόγος κύριου ἐν χειρὶ Αγγαιου τοῦ προφήτου λέγων εἰπὸν δὴ πρὸς Ζοροβαβελ τὸν τοῦ Σαλαθιηλ ἐκ φυλῆς Ιουδα καὶ πρὸς Ἰησοῦν τὸν τοῦ Ιωσεδεκ τὸν ἱερέα τὸν μέγαν λέγων

Daniel 1:1 ἐπὶ βασιλέως Ιωακιμ τῆς Ιουδαίας ἔτους τρίτου παραγενόμενος Ναβουχοδονοσορ βασιλεὺς Βαβυλῶνος εἰς Ιερουσαλημ ἐπολιόρκει αὐτήν

In Attic tragedy, the only example is found in Euripides Heraclidae which is vague without an explicit point of reference. The inferred point of reference is the time of speaking.

Euripides Heraclidae 1-5
{ΙΟΛΑΟΣ}
Πάλαι ποτ' ἐστὶ τοῦτ' ἐμοὶ δεδογμένον·
ὁ μὲν δίκαιος τοῖς πέλας πέφυκ' ἀνήρ,
ὁ δ' ἐς τὸ κέρδος λῆμ' ἔχων ἀνειμένον
πόλει τ' ἄχρηστος καὶ συναλλάσσειν βαρύς,
αὑτῶι δ' ἄριστος· οἶδα δ' οὐ λόγωι μαθών.


Historical narrative is where we would expect to find temporal expressions with a fixed point of reference. In Herodotus and Thucydides there are plenty of temporal locators but not at the beginning of the text. In the new testament, the gospels of Mark and John both use Ἀρχὴ the word found at the beginning of Genesis 1:1.

John 1:1 Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.

Mark 1:1 Ἀρχὴ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ [υἱοῦ θεοῦ].

Are these temporal locators? Neither of them use an historical point of reference to anchor them, e.g. after the death of Moses. John’s Ἐν ἀρχῇ is absolute an echo of Genesis 1:1 LXX which is also absolute. In Mark however Ἀρχὴ is the beginning of something, τοῦ εὐαγγελίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ. Both begin at the beginning, the question is what beginning?

This post isn’t intended to answer those questions. I set out to see if clause initial adverbial expressions used as temporal locators at the very beginning of the text are common in ancient narrative. I only looked at a small sample and included some non-narrative texts (Homer, Attic Tragedy, Hebrew Prophets). What I discovered is, temporal locators in clause initial position at the very beginning of the text is not a typical pattern. The two examples from the gospels, Mark and John are somewhat complex, both remind us somewhat of Genesis, John more so than Mark. Haggai and Daniel seem to fit the pattern. Not exactly the pattern in Genesis but the pattern for narrative temporal locators. Unlike Genesis, they use a relative reference to a reigning monarch to anchor them in history.

What I conclude from a brief review of a limited sample is there are complex issues that need to be sorted out in regard to Ἐν ἀρχῇ in Genesis 1:1

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, April 30, 2010

scenarios - packages & wrappers

scenario internal structure - packages & wrappers

R.A. Hoyle in appendix F [1] once again provides evidence for his claim that participle clauses belong to the scenario of the main verb. I am exploring another way of looking at this. Narrative scenarios appear to have an internal structure which could explained using a “package” metaphor. In NT greek a narrative episode is often preceded by a participle which provides either time, place or circumstances in regard to the following finite verb. This participle might be thought of as a “wrapper” serving as part of a “package” that contains the scenario. This participle does not always bind semantically to the scenario of the following finite verb. In some cases it binds to the preceding scenario. Take for example Mk 5:1-2:

Mark 5:1 Καὶ ἦλθον εἰς τὸ πέραν τῆς θαλάσσης εἰς τὴν χώραν τῶν Γερασηνῶν. 2 καὶ ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου εὐθὺς ὑπήντησεν αὐτῷ ἐκ τῶν μνημείων ἄνθρωπος ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ,

The participle clause ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου marks the termination of a travel by boat scenario. The fact that Jesus had just got out of the boat onto the land doesn’t play a major role in the following scenario. Jesus could have arrived by other means at this location without disturbing the following scenario. On the other hand, getting off the boat is a prototypical end “wrapper” for a travel by boat scenario. Mk 5:1-5:2a serves a double purpose. It terminates the preceding scenario and it provides time and location information for the following scenario. If we think of scenarios as packages, Mk 5:1-5:2a is the end wrapper for the travel by boat scenario. The wrapper for the travel by boat scenario is found in Mk 4:35b and 5:2a. The scenario wrapper begins with the decision to travel by boat Mk 4:35b διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πέραν and ends with the statement that Jesus disembarked Mk 5:2a καὶ ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου.

Mark 4:35 Καὶ λέγει αὐτοῖς ἐν ἐκείνῃ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ὀψίας γενομένης· διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πέραν. 36 καὶ ἀφέντες τὸν ὄχλον παραλαμβάνουσιν αὐτὸν ὡς ἦν ἐν τῷ πλοίῳ, καὶ ἄλλα πλοῖα ἦν μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ.

Mark 5:1 Καὶ ἦλθον εἰς τὸ πέραν τῆς θαλάσσης εἰς τὴν χώραν τῶν Γερασηνῶν. 2 καὶ ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου εὐθὺς ὑπήντησεν αὐτῷ ἐκ τῶν μνημείων ἄνθρωπος ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ,

The wrapper in the travel by boat scenario is semantically closely associated with the situation represented in the scenario. This isn’t always true. Mk 5:1-2a also provides a time and place for the scenario that follows. But it doesn’t matter much how Jesus arrived when he was confronted by the demoniac. It is not crucial to the story that he arrived by boat. If we define a generic story episode scenario as having a wrapper which may provide time, location and circumstances, then the scenario within the wrapper can be though of as a subordinate scenario contained by the story episode scenario. In other words, the healing of the demoniac is a scenario contained within a story episode wrapper which makes it a sort of package. The package wrapper may not always be semantically tightly bound with the scenario inside. The wrapper has a narrative discourse function. It links the episodes together by place, time and circumstance.

[1]appendix F “Evidence That Greek Participial Clauses Belong in the Main Verb’s Scenario” page 523ff, but see also pages 100, 254, 255 and qualifications of this claim on pages 122, 136. Richard A. Hoyle, Scenarios, discourse and translation. SIL 2008

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 19, 2010

boundaries: scenarios & stories pt. 2

In my last post I suggested that the arrival of Jesus and the disciples by boat was not a part of the exorcism scenario. An exorcism embedded in a complex narrative episode may not have any time or location information attached specifically to the exorcism. It may inherit the time and location from a larger narrative segment. To illustrate this read Mark 9:1-29. In verse 14 we read Καὶ ἐλθόντες πρὸς τοὺς μαθητὰς, but there is no indication where the disciples were located. The last location mentioned in the story is found in Mk 9:9a Καὶ καταβαινόντων αὐτῶν ἐκ τοῦ ὄρους and that location note is dependent on the previous time and location mentioned in Mk 9:2 Καὶ μετὰ ἡμέρας ἓξ παραλαμβάνει ὁ Ἰησοῦς τὸν Πέτρον καὶ τὸν Ἰάκωβον καὶ τὸν Ἰωάννην καὶ ἀναφέρει αὐτοὺς εἰς ὄρος ὑψηλὸν κατ᾿ ἰδίαν μόνους. So there is a chain of dependency concerning time and location which links Mk 9:2,9,14.

My current thinking, which could change momentarily, is that including attributes (slots) from a generic "story episode" scenario within each species of story episode, e.g. travel by boat, storm at sea, exorcism, creates a lot of unnecessary redundancy in the the network of semantic frames/scenarios. Attributes (slots) which are universal to story episodes should be recorded at a higher level of the semantic hierarchy and inherited rather than duplicated. The attributes of an exorcism scenario should function such that a mere mention of the attribute will activate the scenario, making all the attributes of exorcism "accessible" as "hearer old" information.

To illustrate, a "reading scripture" scenario in the NT is prototypically associated with the Synagogue. For this reason, a mere mention of Synagogue as a location will make the "reading scripture" scenario available, in other words "reading scripture" becomes "hearer old" by activating Synagogue. Fishing in the gospels is generally associated with boats and the Sea of Galilee (a.k.a. Lake of Gennesaret). The mere mention of a boat in the gospels makes both the Sea of Galilee and fishing active, "hearer old" even if no fishing takes place in the pericope.

By contrast an exorcism scenario in the gospels does not associate prototypically with a type of location. Arriving by boat in Mk 5:1-2 does not make the exorcism scenario active or "hearer old". In like manner coming down of the mountain in Mk 9:9 does not activate the exorcism scenario. For this reason the location slot in the story episode frame probably belongs somewhere else, not in the definition of the exorcism scenario.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

boundaries: scenarios and stories

A scenario[1] is prototypical semantic situation, e.g., taking a meal, going fishing, travel by boat, a storm at sea. A script[1] is a prototypical sequence of events that are identified with a particular scenario. The boundaries for a story episode are often not identical with the boundaries of a scenario. To illustrate, we will look at the transition between two episodes; the "Storm on the Lake" (Mk 4:35-41) and the "Healing of the Gerasene Demoniac" (Mk 5:1-20).

An episode in a story prototypically begins with a statement about time, location, setting.

Mark 4:35 Καὶ λέγει αὐτοῖς ἐν ἐκείνῃ τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ὀψίας γενομένης· διέλθωμεν εἰς τὸ πέραν. 36 καὶ ἀφέντες τὸν ὄχλον παραλαμβάνουσιν αὐτὸν ὡς ἦν ἐν τῷ πλοίῳ, καὶ ἄλλα πλοῖα ἦν μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ.

What follows is a travel by boat scenario with an embedded storm at sea scenario. A travel scenario is bounded by a start location and a destination. In this travel scenario the destination is reached in Mark 5:1.

Mark 5:1 Καὶ ἦλθον εἰς τὸ πέραν τῆς θαλάσσης εἰς τὴν χώραν τῶν Γερασηνῶν. 2 καὶ ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου εὐθὺς ὑπήντησεν αὐτῷ ἐκ τῶν μνημείων ἄνθρωπος ἐν πνεύματι ἀκαθάρτῳ,

In regard to the travel boat scenario Mark 5:2a καὶ ἐξελθόντος αὐτοῦ ἐκ τοῦ πλοίου is the end point. Someone might argue that 5:1 is the end. But that doesn't matter. The next episode, Healing of the Gerasene Demoniac. begins at 5:1-5:2a with location and temporal information. The healing scenario begins with Mk 5:2b.

The semantic situation (scenario) "healing a demoniac" does not include arrival by boat as the first item in the script. Arrival by boat, belongs to a script for a travel scenario. Arrival by boat is the end of one episode and beginning of another. It is semantically related to a travel scenario and not a healing scenario.

One might argue that a more abstract "narrative episode" scenario could be used with a script the includes arrival at some point and time where the episode begins. This would make the story episode boundaries identical with the scenario boundaries by definition. I don't think that would be a very useful procedure. For the purpose of semantic analysis and the identification of inferential associations we would still need to identify a travel by boat scenario, a storm scenario, a healing of demoniac (exorcism) scenario.


[1] I am reading a paper by R.A. Hoyle on Scenarios, Discourse and Translation which is available from SIL as a PDF . In the following posts on this subject I will assume some familiarity with the framework used in this paper.

Hoyle, Richard A. 2008. Scenarios, discourse, and translation: the scenario theory of Cognitive Linguistics, its relevance for analysing New Testament Greek and modern Parkari texts, and its implications for translation theory. SIL e-Books, 10. [Dallas]: SIL International. xi, 835 p. PDF

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, August 29, 2009

constituent order & textual cohesion in 2Cor 5:1

This morning while I was reading Paul's second epistle to the Corinthians when I happened upon some fronted accusatives in 2Cor 5:1:

2Cor. 5:1 Οἴδαμεν γὰρ ὅτι ἐὰν ἡ ἐπίγειος ἡμῶν οἰκία τοῦ σκήνους καταλυθῇ, οἰκοδομὴν ἐκ θεοῦ ἔχομεν, οἰκίαν ἀχειροποίητον αἰώνιον ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς.

2Cor. 5:1 ¶ For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. [NRSV]

My question: What should we make of the clause initial OIKIADOMHN οἰκοδομὴν and OKIAN οἰκίαν?

Perhaps calling OKIAN οἰκίαν ... a clause will bother some people, perhaps we should say that it might be analyzed as a deep structure clause. Even that will bother some people. Let's do and end run on that one and just look at clause initial OIKIADOMHN οἰκοδομὴν. What can we say about the position of this word?

I'm thinking about it ....

Labels: , , , , , , , ,